Some thoughts on the issues of teaching in other cultures
Cultures are dynamic and human memory short – I have been alarmed at the rapidity of change, at the loss and erosion of sustainable traditional practices as ‘Green Revolution’ techniques and concepts introduced only a few decades ago have been accepted and applied unquestioningly in the ‘developing’ world.
This has been compounded with the introduction of centralised education and schooling which gives the young little opportunity to learn traditional skills in the traditional way together with the infiltration of the cash economy and the general devaluation of farming as a profession.
This in turn is largely a result of the shift from subsistence farming to commercial agriculture which in turn is exacerbated by the corruption of local wealthy families, their exploitation of the poor, and the control of international markets which keep prices artificially low – especially at the producer end – in the name of the ‘free economy’ and globalisation. The end scenario is that the rural poor are poorer than ever before, the young are increasingly alienated from their culture and see little or no future in farming or village life.
In Bali one rarely sees a young person working in the fields or rice paddies – it’s the old folk out there and one wonders what will happen when they are simply too old to continue such hard physical labour. I’m informed that it’s not only in the relative affluence of Bali that this is happening, it’s a phenomena occurring in all too many places, countries and cultures.
I was invited to teach a PDC in Indonesia in March 1999. Thirty-five participants from all over Indonesia, from very different cultures and climates from Sumatra to Kalimantantan to West Timor, converged in Bali for the course. There was concern amongst some participants and organisers as to whether the course would be truly appropriate or whether it was just another kind of colonialism – an Australian concept taught by an Australian teacher. This is a trap and a risk that I am acutely aware of and careful to avoid. In many respects it depends upon how the teacher sees permaculture as well as the way it is taught.
The risk is greatest when the teacher sees permaculture as a kind of formula and teaches recipe sheet-mulching, banana circles, mandala gardens and Zones 1 to 5 – there are a lot of things, ideas and design strategies in permaculture that people can readily turn into perma-dogmas. When this happens then – yes – it’s a new perma-colonialism. You don’t need to do a PDC to make a herb spiral, chook-tractor or create a food forest – these things can be easily done from the plan, from the books.
What I see as being the most valuable thing about permaculture, and the greatest challenge for a permaculture teacher to teach, is the process of lateral thinking and questioning, of developing the art of analytical observation – not just of things but more importantly of the processes at play, of seeking and interpreting information and applying it appropriately to the situation at hand. The greatest challenge is that these ‘process’ skills cannot be simply taught – like one can simply teach how to make a tyre pond – the best one can do as a teacher is to try and facilitate the student’s own learning of these process skills through example and by providing opportunities for the students to practice, explore and interact.
At the end of the Bali course the most rewarding feedback from students was “Thank you for teaching me how to think” along with “Thank you for helping me see my culture in a new way and the importance of our sustainable traditions that are being lost.”
As westerners we take so much for granted, especially our ‘freedom’ of thought. It was a cultural shock for me to fully appreciate how repressed human thinking and creativity can be. My Indonesian course participants explained how their education is all rote learning with no room (and severe penalties) for original thinking, questioning or creativity, how this is re-enforced by the day to day reality of living in a controlled and corrupt socio-political environment.
Living in some traditional cultures can also be ruthlessly thought-repressive, the young (including young adults) have no say, do as they’re told, and ‘you do it this way because this is the way it’s done and because it’s what you’ve been told to do’. There are no other reason’s why and to question is to defy authority. The opportunity for innovation is severely limited.
This lack of analytical questioning and creative thinking leaves a culture exceptionally vulnerable, especially when an expert, respected as a figure of higher authority, comes along and says ‘don’t do it that way-do it this way’. Change can be, and frequently is, accepted without question or thought. People may feel intuitively uncomfortable with some of the changes and concerned about the results as they manifest over time, but lack the knowledge to understand why it’s not working and lack access to information to look at alternatives.
Permaculture as a process of analytical observation, lateral thinking and creative problem solving together with a basic understanding of ecology and natural process certainly draws upon examples of sustainable traditional systems from around the world. Yet it pays to remember that most of these systems evolved countless generations ago as a result of trial and error without necessarily understanding the why’s, or if the why’s were initially understood that information has not always been passed on. (Beware of the ‘noble-savage’ syndrome).
I have found when teaching permaculture in developing countries and with indigenous peoples that my students are exhilarated with their awakening awareness of process and creative thinking, and of having a framework of principles of sustainability by which to look afresh at their culture and measure the relative sustainability of remaining traditions, introduced practices and a fresh enthusiasm to rediscover (recover) the traditional practices, knowledge and wisdom that is rapidly being lost.
Culture is dynamic, just like an ecosystem is a dynamic system, continuously evolving and adapting to new influences and changing factors around and within itself. The risk in human culture is that the good practices that have sustained in the past can be so easily lost and replaced with new techniques and values that erode human security, well-being and the environment and resource base it depends on.
In the same way Permaculture also needs to be seen and taught as a dynamic system of thinking, planning and design which is adapted and reinvented in each new culture and context into which it is introduced. Permaculture needs to constantly adjust and adapt to the changing needs, perceptions and demands of a changing world. Indeed, this is the only sustainable future for permaculture as a concept and as a movement or it risks stagnation and becoming frozen in the dogmas created by its perpetrators.
© Robyn Francis 2000
Robyn Francis is well known as a designer and teacher of permaculture since 1985 and was founding director of Permaculture International. She continues to pioneer new frontiers in her work and share this accumulated experience through her courses. Robyn established and manages Djanbung Gardens Permaculture Education Centre and the ERDA Institute Trust at Nimbin in Northern NSW.
This article was published in Permaculture International Journal in 2000?